<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: La Crosse WS-2316U Wireless Weather Station Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elperfecto.com/2009/07/29/la-crosse-ws-2316u-wireless-weather-station-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elperfecto.com/2009/07/29/la-crosse-ws-2316u-wireless-weather-station-review/</link>
	<description>Clean Energy, Real Food - plus science and tech stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:14:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.elperfecto.com/2009/07/29/la-crosse-ws-2316u-wireless-weather-station-review/comment-page-1/#comment-8820</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elperfecto.com/?p=297#comment-8820</guid>
		<description>Earl,

Thanks for posting this great review. I bought the WS-2316U on ebay also, and put up the all but the anemometer about 2 years ago.  I think I have problems with the transmitter or receiver or both.  No longer get atomic time reception.  

I downloaded WUHU so that I could set up a weather station on weather underground.  The LaCrosse reception became very erratic, but I was somewhat lead to believe that the station might be getting noise from the serial port that causes it to act flaky.  I think I have minimized this problem by a) updating my heavyweather software which now outputs a file for WUHU, b) set WUHU to read the output file instead of the console, and c) did several master resets to the console (pressure + wind simultaneously for 5 secs.)

Just a week or two ago, I bought a Zephyr pws-1000td.  It is up and running with all the sensors.  The numbers are so different between the two systems that I don&#039;t trust any of them.

We decided to  mount the La Crosse anemometer, but the bracket disintegrated.  I ordered a replacement bracket.

So, soon I will have 2 complete systems (different frequencies), with data that I don&#039;t trust.  

So what did you finally use to replace your system, and what do you think of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earl,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting this great review. I bought the WS-2316U on ebay also, and put up the all but the anemometer about 2 years ago.  I think I have problems with the transmitter or receiver or both.  No longer get atomic time reception.  </p>
<p>I downloaded WUHU so that I could set up a weather station on weather underground.  The LaCrosse reception became very erratic, but I was somewhat lead to believe that the station might be getting noise from the serial port that causes it to act flaky.  I think I have minimized this problem by a) updating my heavyweather software which now outputs a file for WUHU, b) set WUHU to read the output file instead of the console, and c) did several master resets to the console (pressure + wind simultaneously for 5 secs.)</p>
<p>Just a week or two ago, I bought a Zephyr pws-1000td.  It is up and running with all the sensors.  The numbers are so different between the two systems that I don&#8217;t trust any of them.</p>
<p>We decided to  mount the La Crosse anemometer, but the bracket disintegrated.  I ordered a replacement bracket.</p>
<p>So, soon I will have 2 complete systems (different frequencies), with data that I don&#8217;t trust.  </p>
<p>So what did you finally use to replace your system, and what do you think of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.elperfecto.com/2009/07/29/la-crosse-ws-2316u-wireless-weather-station-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2586</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elperfecto.com/?p=297#comment-2586</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your input on the different brands.  I agree that Oregon Scientific is better quality.  I have a couple sensors made by them that are still working.

My next weather station will be home-built using microcontrollers and sensors.  When that day comes, I&#039;ll post my results on this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your input on the different brands.  I agree that Oregon Scientific is better quality.  I have a couple sensors made by them that are still working.</p>
<p>My next weather station will be home-built using microcontrollers and sensors.  When that day comes, I&#8217;ll post my results on this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.elperfecto.com/2009/07/29/la-crosse-ws-2316u-wireless-weather-station-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2551</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elperfecto.com/?p=297#comment-2551</guid>
		<description>Well I too havn\&#039;t had great experience with Lacrosse units. They\&#039;re so flimsy and cheaply built. I have owned Oregon scientific units that have proven to be the better deal. Of course the wind sensors to them arn\&#039;t wired to a main transmitter like Lacrosse units are. They are independant with no wires. Unless you want to break out a latter or take the wind generators mast down, battery changes would be challenging. And some models have solar but the solar only works during the day and doesn\&#039;t charge the batteries. You could go with a Davis but they can be expensive and setup is complicated. Ambient Weather makes some nice weather stations too. I geuss it depends on your preferences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I too havn\&#8217;t had great experience with Lacrosse units. They\&#8217;re so flimsy and cheaply built. I have owned Oregon scientific units that have proven to be the better deal. Of course the wind sensors to them arn\&#8217;t wired to a main transmitter like Lacrosse units are. They are independant with no wires. Unless you want to break out a latter or take the wind generators mast down, battery changes would be challenging. And some models have solar but the solar only works during the day and doesn\&#8217;t charge the batteries. You could go with a Davis but they can be expensive and setup is complicated. Ambient Weather makes some nice weather stations too. I geuss it depends on your preferences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

